report: be important in database

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in database 1.00
be used in database 0.97
be useful in database 0.96
be important in system 0.77
be from data 0.76
be from data used 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evidence, be from data used)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important in database)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(evidence, be from data used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be from data used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(evidence, be from data used)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in database)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important in database)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(report, be used in database)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(report, be used in database)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(report, be used in database)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(report, be useful in database)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(report, be useful in database)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(report, be useful in database)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(report, be useful in database)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(report, be used in database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important in database)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evidence, be from data used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important in database)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(evidence, be from data used)