reporter: do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.75
, idiot
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stringer
Weight: 0.49
, editor
Weight: 0.34
, photographer
Weight: 0.34
, critic
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
do 1.00
talk much to themselves 0.79
say look 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(photographer, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(photographer, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(photographer, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(reporter, do)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(reporter, talk much to themselves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(reporter, say look)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(reporter, talk much to themselves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(reporter, talk much to themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reporter, say look)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(reporter, do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reporter, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(reporter, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(photographer, do)