reptile: be covered in scales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, cold blooded animal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.78
, turtle
Weight: 0.77
, lizard
Weight: 0.76
, alligator
Weight: 0.75
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in scales 1.00
have scales 0.91
have waterproof scales 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have scales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lizard, have scales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, have scales)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(reptile, be covered in scales)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reptile, have scales)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(reptile, have scales)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(reptile, have scales)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(reptile, have scales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be covered in scales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(reptile, be covered in scales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be covered in scales)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lizard, have scales)