reptile: develop from species of amphibians

Related concepts

Parents	wild animal Weight: 0.68 , creature Weight: 0.63 , animal Weight: 0.62 , thing Weight: 0.60 , cold blooded animal Weight: 0.59
Siblings	frog Weight: 0.78 , turtle Weight: 0.77 , lizard Weight: 0.76 , alligator Weight: 0.75 , monitor lizard Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property	Similarity
develop from species of amphibians	1.00
is amphibians	0.95
be different from amphibians	0.94
evolve from amphibians	0.94
be related to amphibians	0.93
develop from species	0.93
be more developed than amphibians	0.93
be better than amphibians	0.92
be on better land than amphibians	0.91
breathe than amphibians	0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(frog, is amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to amphibians)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(reptile, be related to amphibians)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(reptile, be related to amphibians)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(reptile, be related to amphibians)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)