research: affect other animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect other animals 1.00
affect animals 0.97
be with animals 0.89
affect human life 0.81
affect life 0.79
be on rat behaviour applicable on humans 0.77
affect environment 0.77
apply to humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, affect human life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, affect life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, apply to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(nanotechnology, affect human life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, affect human life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(nanotechnology, affect life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, affect life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(study, apply to humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(research, affect other animals)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(research, be with animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(research, be with animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(research, be with animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(research, affect life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(research, be with animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(research, affect life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(research, affect life)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(research, affect life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(research, affect other animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, affect human life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, affect life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, apply to humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(research, affect other animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)