research: be fundamental to marketing concept

Related concepts

Parents	journal Weight: 0.61 , concept Weight: 0.59 , project Weight: 0.58 , sector Weight: 0.58
Siblings	lineage Weight: 0.45 , translocation Weight: 0.45 , study Weight: 0.35 , nanotechnology Weight: 0.34 , analysis Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be fundamental to marketing concept	1.00
be important in marketing	0.85
apply to marketing strategy	0.85
be vital to sport marketing	0.81
is fundamentally paradoxical	0.77
be important to technological development	0.77
be important to development	0.76
be necessary tool in philosophy	0.76
be important in development	0.76
be integral part of designing process	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(project, be important in development) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be necessary tool in philosophy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(project, be important in development) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(analysis, be necessary tool in philosophy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(analysis, be necessary tool in philosophy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to sport marketing)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(research, be important to technological development)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(research, be vital to sport marketing)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(research, be vital to sport marketing)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(research, be important to technological development)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(research, be important to technological development)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(research, be vital to sport marketing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(research, be important to development)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(research, be important to technological development)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(research, be important to development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(project, be important in development)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(analysis, be necessary tool in philosophy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(project, be important in development)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(research, be fundamental to marketing concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)