research: be important to development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to development 1.00
be important in development 1.00
has state development 0.89
be important to technological development 0.86
bring development 0.86
bring about development 0.85
bring national development 0.83
is recent development 0.83
bring about national development 0.83
be considered backbone of development 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sector, is recent development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, bring about national development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, bring about development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, bring development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(project, bring development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, bring about development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(project, bring national development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, bring about national development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sector, is recent development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sector, is recent development)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(project, bring about national development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(project, bring development)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(project, bring about development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sector, is recent development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, bring development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, bring about development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, bring about national development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(research, be important to development)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to technological development)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(research, be important to technological development)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(research, be important to technological development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(research, be important to technological development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring about development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, bring about national development)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sector, is recent development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring about development)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, bring about national development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(research, be important to development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sector, is recent development)