sector: has state development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state development 1.00
be important for development meritnation 0.89
be important for development 0.89
is recent development 0.84
have impact on development 0.82
test important in software development 0.80
be considered backbone of development 0.78
backbone of development 0.78
effect child development 0.77
has state sales 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unit, has state sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(unit, has state sales)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, effect child development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(unit, has state sales)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, effect child development)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(unit, has state sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sector, has state development)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sector, is recent development)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sector, backbone of development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sector, is recent development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sector, is recent development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sector, be considered backbone of development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sector, backbone of development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sector, backbone of development)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sector, is recent development)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, backbone of development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered backbone of development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has state sales)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(unit, test important in software development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has state sales)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(unit, test important in software development)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(sector, has state development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)