unit: test important in software development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
test important in software development 1.00
test different from integration testing 0.86
test 0.82
testing 0.80
is design important 0.77
be for measurement important 0.76
be important in measurement 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(unit, test important in software development)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(unit, test different from integration testing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(unit, test)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(unit, testing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(unit, test different from integration testing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(unit, test)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(unit, test different from integration testing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(unit, testing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(unit, be important in measurement)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(unit, test)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(unit, testing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(unit, be important in measurement)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(unit, be important in measurement)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(unit, test different from integration testing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unit, test)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(unit, testing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in measurement)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(unit, test important in software development)