unit: be for measurement important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, market
Weight: 0.61
, office
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central processing unit
Weight: 0.79
, battalion
Weight: 0.72
, division
Weight: 0.69
, processor
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for measurement important 1.00
be important in measurement 1.00
be for measurement 0.98
be good measuring 0.85
be measured 0.77
test important in software development 0.76
measuring quantities 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(unit, be for measurement important)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(unit, be important in measurement)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(unit, be for measurement)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(unit, be important in measurement)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(unit, be for measurement)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(unit, be important in measurement)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(unit, be for measurement)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(unit, be good measuring)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unit, be good measuring)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(unit, be good measuring)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(unit, be for measurement)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(unit, be important in measurement)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(unit, be measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(unit, be measured)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unit, measuring quantities)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(unit, measuring quantities)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(unit, test important in software development)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(unit, be measured)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(unit, measuring quantities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(unit, test important in software development)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(unit, test important in software development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(unit, be good measuring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(unit, test important in software development)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(unit, be measured)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(unit, measuring quantities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(unit, be for measurement important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(unit, be for measurement important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(unit, be for measurement important)