research: be vital to clinical practice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vital to clinical practice 1.00
be vital to practice 0.89
be needed in clinical psychology 0.87
practice for health professionals 0.79
be useful in field of medicine 0.79
is vital 0.78
be important for medical school 0.77
be important in medicine 0.77
be important in nursing 0.76
important in nursing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(study, be important in nursing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be important in medicine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(study, be important in nursing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(study, be important in nursing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be needed in clinical psychology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be needed in clinical psychology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(research, be needed in clinical psychology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(research, important in nursing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(research, practice for health professionals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(research, practice for health professionals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(research, practice for health professionals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be needed in clinical psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(research, be important for medical school)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(research, practice for health professionals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(research, important in nursing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(research, important in nursing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(research, be important for medical school)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(research, important in nursing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(research, be important for medical school)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(research, be important for medical school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(research, be vital to clinical practice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be useful in field of medicine)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be important in medicine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(research, be vital to clinical practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(study, be important in nursing)