researcher: develop types

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop types 1.00
develop new types 0.98
develop new types of antibiotics 0.84
develop types of antibiotics 0.82
have studying use of alternative fuels agencies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(researcher, develop types)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop new types)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop new types of antibiotics)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop types of antibiotics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(researcher, develop types of antibiotics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(researcher, develop new types)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(researcher, develop new types of antibiotics)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(researcher, develop types of antibiotics)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(researcher, develop new types)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(researcher, develop new types of antibiotics)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(researcher, develop new types)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(researcher, develop types of antibiotics)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(researcher, develop new types of antibiotics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop types)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(researcher, develop types)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(researcher, develop types)