researcher: draw conclusion conducting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
draw conclusion conducting 1.00
is conducted 0.79
is conclusion likely incorrect 0.78
conduct literature review 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(study, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(study, is conducted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, is conducted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(study, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, is conducted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(researcher, is conclusion likely incorrect)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(researcher, is conducted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(researcher, is conclusion likely incorrect)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(researcher, conduct literature review)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(researcher, is conclusion likely incorrect)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(researcher, is conducted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(researcher, conduct literature review)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, is conducted)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(researcher, conduct literature review)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(researcher, is conclusion likely incorrect)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(researcher, conduct literature review)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, is conducted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, is conducted)