researcher: is conducted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is conducted 1.00
draw conclusion conducting 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(study, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, is conducted)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(study, is conducted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, is conducted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(study, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(researcher, is conducted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(researcher, is conducted)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(researcher, draw conclusion conducting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, is conducted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(researcher, is conducted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, is conducted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(researcher, is conducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, is conducted)