researcher: observe random samples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
observe random samples 1.00
use samples 0.89
sample 0.84
use purposive sampling 0.79
use probability sampling 0.78
randomly assign participants to conditions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(researcher, observe random samples)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(researcher, use samples)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(researcher, sample)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(researcher, use samples)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(researcher, sample)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(researcher, use samples)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(researcher, sample)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use samples)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(researcher, sample)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(researcher, observe random samples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(researcher, observe random samples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(researcher, observe random samples)