researcher: randomly assign participants to conditions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
randomly assign participants to conditions 1.00
be concerned about use of volunteer participants 0.78
use random assignment 0.77
observe random samples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(researcher, use random assignment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(researcher, observe random samples)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(researcher, be concerned about use of volunteer participants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(researcher, use random assignment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(researcher, use random assignment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(researcher, be concerned about use of volunteer participants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(researcher, use random assignment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(researcher, be concerned about use of volunteer participants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(researcher, observe random samples)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(researcher, be concerned about use of volunteer participants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(researcher, observe random samples)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(researcher, observe random samples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(researcher, randomly assign participants to conditions)