researcher: use blind designs

Property	Similarity
use blind designs	1.00
use double blind designs	0.95
use designs	0.89
use double designs	0.86
use experimental designs	0.84
use quasi experimental designs	0.81

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(researcher, use designs)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(researcher, use designs)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(researcher, use double designs)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(researcher, use designs)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use double designs)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(researcher, use double designs)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(researcher, use double designs)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(researcher, use blind designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use designs)

Parents	psychologist Weight: 0.72 , expert Weight: 0.65 , person Weight: 0.59 , study Weight: 0.58
Siblings	author Weight: 0.73 , scientist Weight: 0.70 , professor Weight: 0.69 , colleague Weight: 0.64

researcher: use blind designs

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible