researcher: use designs

Property	Similarity
use designs	1.00
use double designs	0.92
use experimental designs	0.90
use blind designs	0.89
use double blind designs	0.84
use quasi experimental designs	0.84

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use double designs)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use blind designs)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(researcher, use blind designs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(researcher, use blind designs)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(researcher, use double designs)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(researcher, use experimental designs)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(researcher, use double blind designs)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(researcher, use blind designs)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(researcher, use double designs)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(researcher, use double designs)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(researcher, use designs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(researcher, use double blind designs)

Parents	psychologist Weight: 0.72 , expert Weight: 0.65 , person Weight: 0.59 , study Weight: 0.58
Siblings	author Weight: 0.73 , scientist Weight: 0.70 , professor Weight: 0.69 , colleague Weight: 0.64

researcher: use designs

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible