resolution: be measured in digital camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in digital camera 1.00
be measured in camera 0.93
be important in digital photography 0.85
CAN can achieved with optical microscope using 0.76
is video 0.75
CAN can achieved with optical microscope 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(council, is video)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is video)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(proposal, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(proposal, is video)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(council, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(council, is video)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be measured in camera)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in camera)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important in digital photography)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(resolution, be measured in camera)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(resolution, be important in digital photography)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(resolution, be measured in camera)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important in digital photography)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(resolution, be important in digital photography)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(resolution, be measured in digital camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(proposal, is video)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be measured in digital camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(council, is video)