resolution: CAN can achieved with optical microscope

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN can achieved with optical microscope 1.00
CAN can achieved with optical microscope using 0.99
CAN can achieved with microscope 0.94
CAN can achieved with microscope using 0.93
CAN can achieved 0.84
be important in microscope construction 0.80
be more important than magnification 0.79
be important to good microscopy 0.79
be different from magnification 0.78
be important in microscopy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope using)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope using)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope using)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope using)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important in microscope construction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(resolution, be important in microscopy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(resolution, be important in microscope construction)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(resolution, be important to good microscopy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(resolution, be important in microscope construction)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important to good microscopy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important in microscopy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(resolution, be important in microscopy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be important to good microscopy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(resolution, be important to good microscopy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important in microscope construction)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resolution, be important in microscopy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)