resource: be allocated in market economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allocated in market economy 1.00
allocated in market economy 1.00
be allocated in free market economy 0.98
allocated in free market economy 0.98
be allocated in economy 0.96
be allocated under economy 0.94
be allocated under compitative market machanism 0.93
be allocated under market machanism 0.93
be allocated in mixed economy 0.91
be distributed in market economy 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resource, allocated in free market economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, allocated in free market economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(resource, allocated in free market economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resource, allocated in free market economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in free market economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in mixed economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in free market economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in free market economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in mixed economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in free market economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in mixed economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in mixed economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)