resource: be allocated under compitative market machanism

Property	Similarity
be allocated under compitative market machanism	1.00
be allocated under market machanism	1.00
be allocated under economy	0.94
be allocated in market economy	0.93
allocated in market economy	0.92
be allocated in free market economy	0.91
allocated in free market economy	0.91
be allocated in economy	0.90
be allocated	0.90
be allocated in game	0.87

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(resource, be allocated)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in market economy)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(resource, allocated in free market economy)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(resource, be allocated)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in market economy)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(resource, allocated in free market economy)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in economy)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in free market economy)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in free market economy)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in market economy)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(resource, allocated in free market economy)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in economy)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in economy)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in free market economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(resource, allocated in free market economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in free market economy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in market economy)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in economy)

Parents	topic Weight: 0.60 , professional Weight: 0.59 , document Weight: 0.59 , barrier Weight: 0.58
Siblings	natural gas Weight: 0.72 , mineral Weight: 0.68 , solar energy Weight: 0.67 , coral reef Weight: 0.65 , guide Weight: 0.65

resource: be allocated under compitative market machanism

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible