resource: be allocated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allocated 1.00
be allocated in game 0.94
be allocated in economy 0.92
be allocated in jamaica 0.90
be allocated under compitative market machanism 0.90
be allocated under market machanism 0.90
be allocated under economy 0.89
be allocated in england 0.87
be allocated in australia 0.87
be allocated in usa 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(resource, be allocated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated)