restaurant: be at canada

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at canada 1.00
be at america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(accommodation, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(accommodation, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at canada)