fast food restaurant: be at america

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at america 1.00
be at canada 0.79
be at tokyo 0.77
be mexican 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(subway, be at tokyo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at canada)