subway: be at tokyo

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, convenience store
Weight: 0.58
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings subway platform
Weight: 0.35
, train station
Weight: 0.33
, bus station
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33
, new york
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tokyo 1.00
be at america 0.77
be at berkeley 0.77
be defined as in new york ny subway 0.77
be at europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(subway, be at tokyo)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(subway, be at tokyo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(train station, be at europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(train station, be at europe)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(train station, be at europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(subway, be at tokyo)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(subway, be defined as in new york ny subway)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(subway, be defined as in new york ny subway)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(subway, be defined as in new york ny subway)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(subway, be defined as in new york ny subway)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(subway, be at tokyo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(train station, be at europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(subway, be at tokyo)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)