restaurant: charge tax on food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge tax on food 1.00
have tax 0.89
pay taxes 0.84
have exempt tax 0.84
charge vat tax 0.83
charge for water 0.82
charge people for water 0.82
implement soda tax changes 0.81
be in bengaluru charge 0.81
charge delivery fee 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(institution, have exempt tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(institution, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(institution, have tax)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(institution, have exempt tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(institution, have tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(institution, have exempt tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(institution, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(institution, have exempt tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge for water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge for water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(restaurant, pay taxes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be in bengaluru charge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge for water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, pay taxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge for water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge people for water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(restaurant, pay taxes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, pay taxes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge delivery fee)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge delivery fee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(institution, have tax)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(institution, have exempt tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(institution, have tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(restaurant, charge tax on food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(institution, have exempt tax)