retina: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	blood vessel Weight: 0.57 , central nervous system Weight: 0.55 , tissue Weight: 0.54 , screen Weight: 0.54 , characteristic Weight: 0.53
Siblings	bone tissue Weight: 0.35 , cornea Weight: 0.34 , vascular tissue Weight: 0.34 , abdominal aorta Weight: 0.34 , blood clot Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
has quality bad	0.90
has quality worse	0.90
has quality system	0.84
be better than life	0.83
be better than real life	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality worse)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(retina, has quality better)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(retina, has quality better)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(retina, has quality better)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(retina, has quality better)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(retina, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality good)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(vascular tissue, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, has quality system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(retina, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(retina, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality system)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(vascular tissue, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(retina, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality worse)