retriever: need cold home

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
need cold home 1.00
be in need 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, need cold home)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, be in need)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(golden retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, need cold home)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(golden retriever, be in need)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, be in need)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(retriever, need cold home)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(retriever, be in need)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(retriever, be in need)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(retriever, be in need)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(retriever, need cold home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(golden retriever, need cold home)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(golden retriever, be in need)