review: affect research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect research 1.00
is study 0.80
involve in studies 0.79
be published of scientific investigations 0.76
is analysis 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(review, affect research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(process, is analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(process, is analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(report, be published of scientific investigations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(review, affect research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(report, be published of scientific investigations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(report, be published of scientific investigations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(review, affect research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(review, affect research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(review, affect research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(report, be published of scientific investigations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(review, affect research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)