review: be positive on whole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be positive on whole 1.00
be seen as positive 0.86
be positive in reaction 0.85
be better than whole life 0.84
be at now negative 0.83
be done negative 0.83
is negative 0.83
be at negative 0.83
be done on system negative 0.83
be important to society as whole 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(term, be better than whole life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be positive on whole)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(term, be better than whole life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(term, be better than whole life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(term, be better than whole life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(review, be positive on whole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(review, be positive on whole)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(review, be at now negative)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be at now negative)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(review, be at negative)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(review, be at negative)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(review, be at now negative)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(review, be positive on whole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be positive on whole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(term, be better than whole life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(review, be positive on whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(term, be better than whole life)