review: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality worth 0.85
has quality system 0.84
is good thing 0.78
has quality questions 0.76
be on sarraf bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(analysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(analysis, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(analysis, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ign, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ign, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ign, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(verification, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(analysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ign, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ign, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ign, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ign, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ign, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ign, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(verification, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(verification, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(review, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(review, be on sarraf bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(review, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(verification, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ign, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ign, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ign, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(review, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)