review: be on sarraf bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.59
Siblings copy
Weight: 0.59
, ign
Weight: 0.49
, report
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, verification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on sarraf bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.85
be on sarraf 0.80
is good thing 0.78
be done on system negative 0.78
be positive on whole 0.78
be at now negative 0.77
be done negative 0.76
be at negative 0.76
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(analysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(analysis, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(analysis, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ign, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ign, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(analysis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ign, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ign, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ign, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ign, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(review, be on sarraf bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(review, be on sarraf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(review, be on sarraf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(review, be positive on whole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be at now negative)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(review, be on sarraf bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ign, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ign, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(review, be on sarraf bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(analysis, has quality good)