rhinoceros: is are poached

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, game
Weight: 0.54
, creature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, elephant
Weight: 0.37
, tiger
Weight: 0.36
, zebra
Weight: 0.36
, giraffe
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are poached 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is are poached)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is are poached)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is are poached)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(rhino, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rhino, is are poached)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(elephant, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elephant, is are poached)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(zebra, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zebra, is are poached)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rhinoceros, is are poached)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhinoceros, is are poached)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rhino, is are poached)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zebra, is are poached)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rhinoceros, is are poached) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(elephant, is are poached)