ride: be quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.62
, song
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.59
, adventure
Weight: 0.58
, attraction
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rollercoaster
Weight: 0.71
, slide
Weight: 0.57
, carousel
Weight: 0.55
, matterhorn
Weight: 0.46
, escort service
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be quality 1.00
is quality 0.99
has quality good 0.90
has quality bad 0.86
is low quality 0.85
has quality shit 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(adventure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hit, is low quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hit, is low quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(adventure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(matterhorn, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(carousel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ride, be quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ride, be quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ride, be quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ride, be quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ride, be quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(matterhorn, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(matterhorn, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(carousel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(carousel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ride, be quality)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ride, has quality shit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, has quality shit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ride, has quality shit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ride, has quality shit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ride, be quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(matterhorn, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carousel, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(ride, be quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)