ride: compare to great america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.62
, song
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.59
, adventure
Weight: 0.58
, attraction
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rollercoaster
Weight: 0.71
, slide
Weight: 0.57
, carousel
Weight: 0.55
, matterhorn
Weight: 0.46
, escort service
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to great america 1.00
compare to america 0.96
compare 0.82
be bad in europe 0.79
differ from chinese to english 0.78
be bad in france 0.77
be bad in spain 0.77
i hate everything 0.76
differ from chinese 0.76
share in austin 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hit, i hate everything)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hit, i hate everything)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hit, i hate everything)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in france)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(service, be bad in france)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hit, i hate everything)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ride, compare to great america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ride, compare to great america)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ride, compare to america)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ride, compare to america)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ride, compare to america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ride, share in austin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(ride, share in austin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ride, share in austin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ride, share in austin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ride, compare to great america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hit, i hate everything)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hit, i hate everything)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in france)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ride, compare to great america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)