riding: be better for environment then driving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.57
, sport
Weight: 0.53
, exercise
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, hobby
Weight: 0.47
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.33
, bicycle race
Weight: 0.32
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.32
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for environment then driving 1.00
be better for environment driving 0.98
be better driving 0.93
be better for environment 0.88
be good for environment 0.86
be driving 0.86
be for environment 0.83
was put for little riding hood 0.77
was put for little red riding hood 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better driving)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(riding, be driving)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(riding, be driving)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(riding, be better driving)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(riding, be for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(riding, was put for little riding hood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(riding, was put for little red riding hood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(riding, be good for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(riding, be for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(riding, was put for little riding hood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(riding, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(riding, be good for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(riding, be driving)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(riding, be better for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(riding, be better driving)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(riding, be for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(riding, be for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(riding, was put for little red riding hood)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(riding, was put for little riding hood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(riding, be driving)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(riding, be better driving)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(riding, was put for little riding hood)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(riding, was put for little red riding hood)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(riding, was put for little red riding hood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)