ring: be prone to earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, apparatus
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wedding ring
Weight: 0.83
, ring finger
Weight: 0.70
, pyridine
Weight: 0.49
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to earthquakes 1.00
have earthquakes 0.93
be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes 0.87
have tsunamis volcanoes 0.82
have most active volcanoes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ring, have earthquakes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ring, have earthquakes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ring, have earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ring, have earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ring, have tsunamis volcanoes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ring, have most active volcanoes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(ring, have most active volcanoes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ring, have most active volcanoes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ring, be related to frequent occurrence of earthquakes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ring, have most active volcanoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring, be prone to earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ring, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ring, be prone to earthquakes)