rip: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.57
, protocol
Weight: 0.55
, song
Weight: 0.54
, guard
Weight: 0.51
Siblings tear
Weight: 0.32
, shake
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, hook
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
is current dangerous 0.90
is problematic 0.79
be dangerous to swimmers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, is problematic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(big bang theory, is problematic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, is problematic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rip, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rip, is current dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rip, is current dangerous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rip, is current dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rip, is current dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rip, be dangerous to swimmers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rip, be dangerous to swimmers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rip, be dangerous to swimmers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rip, be dangerous to swimmers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rip, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rip, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rip, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(big bang theory, is problematic)