rise: be in rich nation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents effect
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fall
Weight: 0.63
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, decrease
Weight: 0.33
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, growth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rich nation 1.00
be in world 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rise, be in rich nation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rise, be in rich nation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(erosion, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(erosion, be in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rise, be in rich nation)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rise, be in world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rise, be in world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rise, be in world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rise, be in rich nation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(erosion, be in world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(rise, be in rich nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)