river: be used to transport good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, road
Weight: 0.63
, valley
Weight: 0.62
, human waste
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to transport good 1.00
be used to transport 0.96
be used to transportation of good 0.90
be used to transportation 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(road, be used to transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(road, be used to transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(road, be used to transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(river, be used to transport good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(river, be used to transportation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(river, be used to transportation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(river, be used to transportation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transport good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be used to transport good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transport good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(road, be used to transport)