river: be used to transportation

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, road
Weight: 0.63
, valley
Weight: 0.62
, human waste
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to transportation 1.00
be used to transportation of good 0.96
be used to transport 0.87
be used to transport good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(road, be used to transport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(road, be used to transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(road, be used to transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(river, be used to transportation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(river, be used to transport good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(river, be used to transport good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transport good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(river, be used to transportation of good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, be used to transport good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(river, be used to transportation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(river, be used to transportation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(road, be used to transport)