river: freeze in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, lake superior
Weight: 0.68
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.68
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, lake erie
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
freeze in winter 1.00
be cold in summer 0.82
rise in winter 0.81
is cold 0.76
dry up in summer 0.76
get cold 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(creek, is cold)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, freeze in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(creek, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(creek, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(creek, is cold)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(river, freeze in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(lake erie, is cold)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake tahoe, is cold)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lake superior, is cold)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lake superior, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(river, freeze in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(river, dry up in summer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(river, dry up in summer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(river, dry up in summer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(river, dry up in summer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, rise in winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(river, be cold in summer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, is cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(river, rise in winter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(river, be cold in summer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(river, rise in winter)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(river, be cold in summer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(river, is cold)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(river, rise in winter)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(river, be cold in summer)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(river, is cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, freeze in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creek, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lake superior, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lake erie, is cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(river, freeze in winter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creek, is cold)