river: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, lake superior
Weight: 0.68
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.68
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, lake erie
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
get cold 0.96
be cold in summer 0.89
freeze in winter 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(creek, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, is cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(creek, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(creek, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lake superior, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(creek, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(river, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(lake erie, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is cold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake tahoe, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lake superior, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lake superior, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(river, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(river, be cold in summer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(river, be cold in summer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(river, be cold in summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(river, freeze in winter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(river, freeze in winter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(river, freeze in winter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(river, be cold in summer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, freeze in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creek, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lake superior, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lake erie, is cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(river, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creek, is cold)