rod: be at fish camp

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.59
, instrument
Weight: 0.57
Siblings reel
Weight: 0.58
, plunger
Weight: 0.43
, metal rod
Weight: 0.37
, coil
Weight: 0.33
, roller coaster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fish camp 1.00
be used to catch fish 0.79
be used to help catch fish 0.77
be used to bring in catch fish 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(reel, be used to bring in catch fish)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(reel, be used to help catch fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(reel, be used to help catch fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(reel, be used to help catch fish)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(reel, be used to bring in catch fish)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(reel, be used to bring in catch fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rod, be at fish camp)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(rod, be used to catch fish)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rod, be used to catch fish)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rod, be used to catch fish)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(rod, be used to catch fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rod, be at fish camp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(reel, be used to help catch fish)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rod, be at fish camp)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(reel, be used to bring in catch fish)