rod: be in better light

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.59
, instrument
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fishing rod
Weight: 0.73
, reel
Weight: 0.58
, spline
Weight: 0.34
, coil
Weight: 0.33
, roller coaster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in better light 1.00
be in better low light 0.93
be in light 0.91
be in low light 0.84
be more sensitive to light 0.82
be best suited for night vision 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rod, be in better light)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in better low light)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in light)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rod, be in better low light)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in better low light)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rod, be in light)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in light)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in low light)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in better low light)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rod, be in low light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in low light)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rod, be best suited for night vision)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in low light)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rod, be best suited for night vision)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rod, be best suited for night vision)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rod, be best suited for night vision)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in better light)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rod, be in better light)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rod, be in better light)