rod: be more sensitive to light

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.62
, structure
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.59
, instrument
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fishing rod
Weight: 0.73
, reel
Weight: 0.58
, spline
Weight: 0.34
, coil
Weight: 0.33
, roller coaster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more sensitive to light 1.00
be in light 0.84
be more sensitive than cones 0.83
be in better light 0.82
be in better low light 0.81
be in low light 0.81
provide greater sensitivity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rod, be more sensitive than cones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rod, be more sensitive than cones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in better light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rod, be in better light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive than cones)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in better low light)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rod, be in light)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rod, be in low light)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rod, be more sensitive than cones)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in better low light)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in light)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rod, be in low light)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rod, be in low light)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rod, provide greater sensitivity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rod, be in better low light)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rod, be in better light)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in low light)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rod, be in better light)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rod, be in better low light)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rod, provide greater sensitivity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rod, provide greater sensitivity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(rod, provide greater sensitivity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rod, be more sensitive to light)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rod, be more sensitive to light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rod, be more sensitive to light)