rodent: gnaw

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
gnaw 1.00
chew 0.79
need chew 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chew)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(beaver, chew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beaver, chew)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rodent, gnaw)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rodent, need chew)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(rodent, need chew)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rodent, need chew)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rodent, chew)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rodent, need chew)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rodent, gnaw)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rodent, gnaw)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rodent, gnaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(beaver, chew)