:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(beaver, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chew)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(beaver, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beaver, chew)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(rabbit, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(beaver, eat)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(beaver, eat)
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rodent, chew)
Similarity expansion
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rodent, need chew)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rodent, chew wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(rodent, need chew)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew wires)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rodent, eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew on wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rodent, need chew)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rodent, gnaw)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rodent, chew cables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rodent, gnaw)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rodent, gnaw)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, chew wires)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew cables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rodent, eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew cables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rodent, chew cables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rodent, gnaw)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rodent, need chew)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(beaver, chew)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beaver, eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rodent, chew)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)