rodent: chew wires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
chew wires 1.00
chew on wires 1.00
chew car wires 0.96
chew on car wires 0.96
chew electrical wires 0.95
eat wires 0.93
chew cables 0.90
eat car wires 0.87
chew 0.86
need chew 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(beaver, chew)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(beaver, chew) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(beaver, chew)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rodent, chew wires)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew car wires)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rodent, chew car wires)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew car wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rodent, eat wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat wires)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat car wires)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(rodent, eat car wires)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat car wires)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(rodent, chew car wires)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat wires)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rodent, chew electrical wires)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rodent, chew on car wires)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rodent, eat car wires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew on wires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rodent, chew on wires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew on wires)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rodent, chew on wires)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew cables)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rodent, chew cables)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rodent, need chew)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew cables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rodent, chew cables)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rodent, chew)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(rodent, need chew)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rodent, chew)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rodent, chew)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rodent, need chew)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rodent, need chew)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew wires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(rodent, chew wires)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, chew wires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(beaver, chew)